Alex Leonhardt reviews Department for Work and Pensions v Mrs Susan Boyers [2022] EAT 76, in which the EAT gives useful advice on the above matters (for the second time in the same case).
View ArticleSearch Results for: Quiz 2024 FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4: Useful FCP - FortiAnalyzer 7.4 Analyst Reliable Test Blueprint 🎼 Search for 【 FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 】 and obtain a free download on 「 www.pdfvce.com 」 🌉FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Well Prep
Michelle Marnham considers the case CNZ v Royal United Bath Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. A must-read case for those practising in clinical negligence and especially for those practising in birth injury cases. The case also provides useful guidance on material contribution and apportionment.
View ArticleKatherine Anderson analyses AECOM Limited v Mallon [2023] EAT 104, a case in which the EAT provides a useful review of the authorities on what reasonable enquiries an employer should make of a disabled job applicant.
View ArticleGrace Nicholls considers the case of Macfarlane v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2023] EAT 111, a useful reminder that it is insufficient to simply tick the unfair dismissal box if a claim of whistleblowing is being pursued, and that the disavowal of a claim can indeed, rightly, have far reaching consequences for any application to amend subsequently.
View ArticleSunyana Sharma considers the High Court's decision in Sudheer Shabir v. General Medical Council [2023] EWNH 1772 (Admin), a useful reminder of the core principles that will be applied in professional disciplinary misconduct hearings and/or at the appeal stage.
View ArticleCharlotte Hadfield analyses the case of Omar v Epping Forest District Citizens Advice (EA-2021-000595-JOJ), in which the EAT considers how to construe words spoken “in the heat of the moment” that are said to be words of dismissal or resignation.
The EAT also conducts an extensive and very useful review of the relevant case law.
View ArticleMotoring offences
...private defence of individuals and a direct access service is frequently provided. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your concerns, in the strictest confidence. To organise free initial observations from...
3PB Employment barristers and RadcliffesLeBrasseur to deliver Mock Employment Tribunal to London audience
...a tribunal hearing, the process, what it's like to be questioned and how to give evidence in an effective way. For more information, please contact events@rlb-law.com or Chambers Director Russell...
3PB joins forces with Mackrell to give counsel on the legal cannabis products trade post-Brexit
...companies working within the CBD industry post-Brexit. As of the 1st January 2021, the UK officially left the EU after a deal was agreed on 24 December. The deal will...
3PB shortlisted at the British Legal Awards 2022
3 Paper Buildings (3PB Barristers) has been shortlisted for Chambers of the Year in the British Legal Awards. These awards, now in their 13th year and hosted by Law.com International,...
Paul Newman included in 2025 edition of the Best Lawyers list
3PB Barristers’ (3 Paper Buildings) Paul Newman has been included in the 2025 edition of “The Best Lawyers in the United Kingdom” list for Construction Law, as published by bestlawyers.com....
Nicole Bollard analyses the judgment in Thomas v Luv One Luv All Promotions Ltd and another [2021] EWCA Civ 732, in which the Court of Appeal considered the scope of issue estoppel and when the courts can disapply it due to special circumstances.
Nicole’s article was first published in Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law Dispute Resolution blog on 9 July.
View Article