...of Commons Commission [2022] EAT 104, in which a dismissal for 50 instances of lateness was fair despite disclosure issues. Andrew MacPhail warns against unnecessary criticism when blowing the whistle...
Read More
...scheme Bar in the Community. Click here to learn more and browse Bar in the Community's current opportunities. Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence teams in recruitment drive 3PB’s very successful...
Read More
...dispute. Insightful interviewing and firm advice to clients are critical to avoid incurring significant costs on all sides, especially where costs follow the event. The article provides useful practical tips...
Read More
...was therefore descriptive and non-distinctive. The decision is useful in terms of providing an insight as to what sort of evidence will or will not be deemed sufficient in order...
Read More
...worth, particularly where the valuation of businesses and farm estates are involved and in which his previous experience as a Chartered Management Accountant can provide useful insights. His expertise covers...
Read More
...These are now available on Family Orders, adding to the existing commentary on the Volume 1 orders. Amongst the many changes incorporated and commented upon are the provisions of the...
Read More
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) has seen five members of chambers - personal injury and military/police claims barrister Kim Wilson, commercial barrister Mariya Peykova, property/chancery and family barrister Rachel Bale,...
Read More
3PB's specialist Court of Protection barrister Matthew Wyard explores the recent Court of Protection property and affairs case of Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation v (1) PW (2) the Public Guardian [2024] EWCOP 16.
View Article
3PB's specialist family barrister Stephen Abberley, with contribution from Elizabeth McGrath KC, Laura Scott, Matiss Krumins and Laurie-Elizabeth Ketley, has written a briefing on the recent Court of Appeal case of Re P and E (Care Proceedings: Whether to Hold a Fact-Finding Hearing) [2024] EWCA Civ 403.
View Article
Rosa Thomas analyses the case of Bailey v (1) Stonewall Equality Ltd (2) Garden Court Chambers & Ors [2024] EAT 119, the first reported judgment that directly deals with what it means to cause or induce discrimination under s.111 Equality Act 2010.
This judgment provides helpful guidance, particularly on the mental element required under s.111 and what is required to establish causation under s.111(2).
View Article