3PB Family's Inaugural 2024 Care Conference - Southampton - 6 September 2024
- Date: Friday 6th Sep 2024
- Time: 8:45 am - 4:30 pm
- Venue: Harbour Hotel, 5 Maritime Walk, Southampton SO14 3QT
Rebecca Farrell has written an article for LexisNexis regarding a landlord’s winding-up petition for £167,593.41 against a company incorporated to run a school which was dismissed. The court found there was a strongly arguable case that the bulk of the petition debt did not represent rent arrears payable, but rather a purchase price payable for shares in the company. The court also accepted that there was a cross-clam with a real prospect of success in a sum of at least £546,000 in general damages and potentially exemplary damages as well. The company had raised a strongly arguable case that the purported forfeiture of the lease by physical re-entry between the first and second hearing of the petition (causing the abrupt closure of the school) was unlawful, amongst other arguments in the cross claim.
This article was first published by LexisNexis on 23 July 2024.
View ArticleMatthew Wyard, Jim Hirschmann and Rosa Thomas write for Local Government Lawyer on the framework concerning the duty to consult in public law.
View ArticleRosa Thomas writes for LexisNexis titled Provision in the home does have a place in EHC Plans (London Borough of Camden v KT)
View Article