November employment law update out now!
18th November 2020

3PB employment and discrimination barristers Stephen WyethStephen WyethCall: 2010 and Lachlan WilsonLachlan WilsonCall: 1996 talk about the latest rules on furlough, Vaughan v Modality Partnership, and Remote Hearings - Practice Direction and Open Justice.
Bring yourself right up to date with the latest in employment law by watching this recording coming in at just over an hour:
Related News
-
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings) have been awarded a record number of individual rankings in the 2026 edition of Chambers and Partners, reaching a total of 104 (96 last year) achieved by 86 of its barristers. The national set has doubled its number of individual rankings in 5 years (52 in 2021) and is rewarded with accolades in 22 areas of law across the London Bar as well as in the North Eastern, South Eastern,...
Continue reading -
3PB achieves record rankings in the Legal 500’s 2026 edition
3PB Barristers (3 Paper Buildings), one of the UK's largest chambers, is delighted to announce a record number of rankings - totalling 193 - in the Legal 500 2026’s edition which is published today, compared with 167 last year. A total of 123 3PB barristers are now ranked in the Legal 500, up from 108 last year. The set is ranked in 26 areas of law across 4 large UK Circuits (London, South Eastern, Western...
Continue reading -
3PB’s ‘first rate’ employment law team achieves another Circuit ranking in the Legal 500 2026
3PB’s ‘best in their field’ employment and discrimination law team is delighted to have joined a select few chambers to be ranked in the Midlands in this area of law. The leading team retains its top tier team rankings in the Western and South Eastern Circuits. Clients comment on 'an exceptional chambers, from the first point of contact with the clerks through to the end of the matter’ with ‘their growth a testament to their...
Continue reading -
One off acts with ongoing consequences – an analysis by Joseph England
Joseph England analyses the case of Mr N Ahmed v Capital Arches Group Limited EAT [2025] 133, in which the EAT considered an ET’s decision that claims were presented out of time and the refusal to extend time on the ‘just and equitable’ basis. In doing so, the EAT analyses the distinction between events that occur as one off events with ongoing consequences and conduct extending over a period. This judgment will be of particular...
Continue reading