Nate Lara 893413

Nate Lara

Year of Call: 2024
Solicitor: 2020
Email Address: [email protected]
Telephone: 01202 292102

Download Expertise CV Add Expertise to Shortlist

How to use the Shortlist tool?

Clerk Details

  • Clerk Name: Ellie Bloomfield
  • Clerk Telephone: Practice Manager
  • Clerk Email: [email protected]

Overview

Nate Lara is a probationary tenant barrister and member of the Crime Group at 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) and accepts instructions on the Western and South East Circuits as well as nationally. Nate is based from 3PB's Bournemouth office.

Nate has five years’ experience as a specialised criminal law Solicitor-Advocate in Australia. Nate moved to the UK and completed a reduced six-month specialist criminal pupillage, as a transferring lawyer, with a well-known and highly regarded criminal chambers in London, before joining 3PB in March 2025.

Nate has a busy practice handling both prosecution and defence work across Crown and Magistrates’ Courts in the Dorset, Hampshire and Wiltshire areas as well as on the South East Circuit and nationally.

As a Grade 2 prosecutor, Nate frequently manages trials, sentencing, and procedural issues. He has experience in cases involving serious violence, hate crimes, sexual offences and domestic abuse amongst others.

Nate graduated at the top of his class in criminal law, advanced criminal law and criminal sentencing law, and was appointed to the prestigious graduate scheme at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) in New South Wales (NSW), where he prosecuted serious criminal cases. After a successful period at the ODPP, Nate decided to gain experience as a criminal defence advocate across NSW. Nate successfully defended clients in trials, summary hearings, complex sentences, mental health and bail applications, domestic violence orders and technical appeals.

Nate also acted as a Senior Public Servant in the Compliance, Investigation and Regulatory team at the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care. This saw him conducting investigations and acting as a decision maker on systematic, compliance and criminal breaches in the National Disability and Insurance Scheme and the Aged Care System.

Outside of work, Nate is an experienced football referee and loves all aspects of the game. Nate can be found with his two border collies, Finch and Scout, on any number of the beautiful beaches around Bournemouth.

 

Crime

Nate Lara is a busy probationary tenant barrister who specialises in crime.

Ongoing UK cases

R v VJE & Ors (2025, Wimbledon Youth Court): Defending, a serious aggravated burglary (GBH) which involves the alleged extended torture and imprisonment of a vulnerable victim by three young men. Acting for the first defendant.

R v PW (2025, Bournemouth Crown Court): Prosecuting, arranging a child sexual offence, involving a paedophile hunter organisation and anticipated bad character evidence.

R v CC & SP (2025, Kingston Crown Court): Prosecuting, aggravated robbery of an expensive watch involving GBH, anticipated cut-throat case.

R v RP (2025, Bournemouth Crown Court): Prosecuting, imitation firearm in a public place, anticipated reasonable excuse and forgetfulness matter.

R v BB (2025, Luton Crown Court): Defending, multi-charged serious domestic violence matter, defence involving alibi, non-defendant bad character and self-defence.

R v EQ (2026, Basildon Crown Court): Defending, production of class B drugs, defence involving disputed expert evidence after a DNA finding 18 months after the initial arrest.

Recent UK cases

R v BO (2024, Wood Green Crown Court): Prosecuted and secured a conviction in a multi-charged domestic abuse matter. The matter involved a contested bad character argument, late service of prosecution evidence and the cross-examination of the defendant on an alibi defence.

R v RD (2025, Maidstone Magistrates’ Court): Prosecuted in a busy trial list, secured a conviction in a sexual assault matter, which involved a contested hearsay application involving confession evidence, the calling of three witnesses and the cross-examination of the defendant.

R v AA (2025, St Albans Magistrates’ Court): Successfully defended a client of a serious coercive/control charge involving allegations of sexual manipulation and threats, ensuring the client would be sentenced on much less serious offences, resulting in a significantly reduced sentence.

R v MN (2025, Inner London Crown Court): Defended a client on a serious sexual assault against a random member of the public, advice given on an involuntary intoxication defence. The matter is currently listed for sentence.

R v JE (2024, Croydon Crown Court)

Prosecuting, advising on a serious GBH and violent conduct offence, where only one of 13 involved individuals was identified and charged. Nate gave advice on joint criminal liability, resulting in the continuation of the charges and a substantial restructuring of the prosecution case.

CPS Prosecution Lists: Regularly instructed in Magistrates’ Court Prosecution Lists, where Nate has been required to consider, organise and run up to six trials per day.

Recent Australian cases 

Police v MV (2024, NSW Local Court): Secured an acquittal and awarded compensation for a man charged with multiple domestic violence offences, based on submissions regarding the admissibility of aspects of the Police investigation.

HH v DPP (2024, NSW District Court – Appeal Division): Successfully argued for a reduced sentence, allowing for the release of a man charged with child sex offences on appeal, after a successful argument over the Sentencing Magistrates erroneous application of case law, regarding the objective seriousness and mitigating factors.

Police v LS (2024, NSW Local Court): Successfully argued that a client charged with high-range drink driving and negligent driving, should avoid a term of imprisonment despite a Guideline Judgment allowing community sentences in only the most extremely mitigated cases. Less than 5% of similar cases avoid full-time imprisonment.

Police v SO (2023, NSW Local Court): Successfully defended two charges of sexual touching, based on effective cross-examination of the complainant, and an objection to inadmissible CCTV footage.

Police v CC (2023, NSW Local Court): Secured an acquittal for two charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and wounding with a weapon, after successful submission on the compellability and capacity of the elderly complainant.

Police v DH (2022, NSW Local Court): Successfully defended an army veteran charged with resisting arrest and assaulting a Police Officer, based on self-defence, proving the arresting officers were acting outside the execution of their duties.

Police v HT (2021, NSW Local Court): Secured an acquittal for a client charged with domestic violence offences, after the prosecution sought to lead pre-recorded hearsay evidence, when a witness did not come to court.

JW v DPP (2020, NSW District Court – Appeal Division): Successfully prosecuted an appeal, after an effective cross-examination of fresh evidence from an alibi witness, whose credibility was found in disrepute.

R v JH (2020, NSW Supreme Court): As the instructing solicitor (Reviewing Lawyer), ensured the defendant failed in a dismissal application on charges of murder and related concealing offences.

  • Recommendations

    “Mr Lara's advocacy was of a high quality throughout the week. He made focussed and persuasive submissions in respect of a bad character application. He exercised good judgement in limiting the scope of this application more narrowly than the written application which the Crown had submitted. I was impressed by his cross-examination of the defendant. It was clearly well-prepared. Thought had evidently been given to the structure. He was effective at undermining the defendant's evidence, highlighting the strengths of the prosecution case and he ensured that his case was properly put to the defendant. Mr Lara's closing submissions were delivered with confidence and again it was evident that he was well-prepared.” Judge, Wood Green CC, 2025

    "I had the opportunity to sit in on this trial and see Nate’s detailed preparation and skilful handling of the trial in practice. He made a concerted effort to visit the client in his cells at every opportunity, reassure him, and ensure that his instructions were clear. This approach was critical in helping the client maintain composure and remain robust when giving evidence." Instructing paralegal, Magistrates' C, 2025  

    “Your ability to challenge the defence robustly while maintaining fairness and integrity was truly impressive. You ensured that the case was presented in the strongest possible manner, leaving no stone unturned in the pursuit of justice. The victims and their families could not have asked for a more determined and articulate voice in court, and I have no doubt that your efforts provided them with a sense of reassurance and confidence in the legal process.” Police Officer, Wood Green CC, 2025

    “Throughout, he was polite and professional. His advocacy was clear and effective. Had he not signed his sentencing note, "Pupil Barrister", I would not have known he was a pupil.” Opposing Counsel, Snaresbrook CC, 2025

    “Nate’s professional standards have been high. Nate’s personal values and standards are also high. Nate brings the above standards with him from his practice in Australia” Pupil Supervisor, 2025 

    “Working with Nate Lara was an absolute pleasure from start to finish. His attention to detail and reassuring demeanour throughout the entire legal process made all the difference during what was undoubtedly a stressful time for me. Nate delivered nothing short of victory in the courtroom. I am incredibly grateful for his expertise, dedication, and ultimately, for securing a favourable outcome.” Lay Client, Police v SO, 2024

    “Nate Lara has helped and given me the most ideal outcome. It saved me my future employment and also ensure the whole legal process as smooth and stress free as possible.” Lay Client, R v NM, 2024

    “I was told by multiple lawyers that the chances of achieving a good outcome was at most 10% and I was honestly not very hopeful. However, Nate did it. He got me the best outcome possible, which has made a deep and positive impact on my life. Thank you very much Nate.” Lay Client, R v JL, 2023 

    “Could not be happier with the results I received with the assistance of Nate Lara. He is very thorough and wants to achieve the best outcome possible. Highly recommend to anyone who is in an unfortunate event.” Lay Client, Police v ST, 2023

    • Expand recommendations
View Full CV
<< /span> >