Articles

Toria Holland considers the case of Re Y (Experts and Alienating Behaviour: The Modern Approach) [2026] EWFC 38, in which the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, provides important guidance on the modern approach to parental alienation and the instruction of experts in private children cases.

Even though PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stress the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases.

Luke Nelson reviews the PAG reports, how they help to demystify pensions issues and act as an incredibly useful reference guide for busy practitioners.

Risk, caution and the unintended consequences of “safety first”.

Kate Yeomans reflects on a growing unease among practitioners that in private children law cases involving allegations of domestic abuse or substance misuse, the system increasingly errs so far on the side of caution that it risks abandoning balance, fairness, and – crucially – the child’s welfare. This unease is particularly acute in cases involving fathers.

Mariya Peykova has written an in-depth analysis on the case of 'DSG Retail Limited v Information Commissioner [2026] EWCA Civ 140', which shows the scope of the duty imposed on data controllers protect personal data in their possession and control by taking appropriate technical and organisational measures.

Davinia Riley reviews Reid-Roberts v Mei-Lin [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch), a case that highlights the impact of bankruptcy on financial remedy proceedings and considers what is accepted as a 'signature' in the digital age.

Davinia includes a useful checklist for practitioners to avert disaster.

In MA v WK [2025] EWFC 499, the Family Court refused applications seeking declarations that marriages were valid where the parties had undergone Islamic Nikkah ceremonies in England that did not comply with the formalities of the Marriage Act 1949.

Nathalie Bull acted for the third respondent.

Ben Amunwa has written an in-depth analysis on the case of R (PZP) v HS Academy Trust and another [2026] EWHC 489 (Admin), offering practitioners guidance into the key points to take away from this judgment.

Dr Zhen Ye writes on the recent Court of Appeal case ‘LLC Eurochem North-West-2 v Tecnimont S.P.A and another’.

Following her recent attendance of the Dublin medico-legal conference, Emma McIlveen reflects on the unique legal and ethical minefields that the new perk of egg freezing can create for businesses who offer it to their employees.

Daniel Brown reviews Lamb v Teva UK Ltd [2026] EAT 8 and the EAT’s useful reminder that the question of whether a dismissal was fair or unfair cannot be answered by working through a procedural checklist: in every case, the reason for dismissal and the procedure followed must be viewed broadly and together.

3PB’s property and commercial law barrister Jack Webb writes a detailed guide to s.21 of the Housing Act 1988, offering key guidance to practitioners on how it may be used before the 30 April deadline.

Sarah Clarke considers the EAT's judgment in Dada v The Scottish Ministers [2026] EAT 13 and the emphasis placed on tribunals to not stick slavishly to the section 33 Limitation Act factors when considering whether to extend time under s123 EQA.