3PB Barristers nominated for Chambers of the Year!
24th January 2022
3PB Barristers has been nominated for Chambers of the Year at this year's LexisNexis Legal Awards!
We look forward to celebrating excellence across the legal sector on Wednesday 30 March when the winners will be announced at Grosvenor House!
Related News
-
3PB crime and regulatory barrister Rebecca McKnight has written on the new guidelines for strangulation or suffocation/ racially or religiously aggravated strangulation or suffocation. The new sentencing guidelines will come into force on 1st January 2025.The data in this area is relatively limited given the offences only came into force on 7 June 2022 but practitioners will know that it is becoming increasingly common to see a charge of strangulation or suffocation. There was a...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers' (3 Paper Buildings) specialist chancery and property barrister Oliver Ingham has been successful in a landmark Supreme Court Appeal in Hirachand v Hirachand, bringing an end to the Recovery of CFA Uplifts in Inheritance Act 1975 Litigation. The Supreme Court has today handed down judgment in the case of Hirachand v Hirachand, allowing the Appellant’s appeal and overturning the Court of Appeal’s earlier decision. The ruling represents a significant clarification in Inheritance (Provision...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers’ (3 Paper Buildings) specialist family barristers Stephen Wildblood KC and Imogen Robins will be speaking at Family Law Week’s Financial Remedy: Practice and Procedure Conference, taking place in London on Tuesday 11 March 2025. Experienced family law barrister and former Designated Family Judge for Bristol, Stephen Wildblood KC, will be chairing the event in his capacity as Editor-in-Chief at Family Law Week. Imogen Robins, who is renowned for her expertise in family finance...
Continue reading -
3PB Barristers’ (3 Paper Buildings) specialist commercial, chancery and property barrister Alexander Whatley has written for LexisNexis on the case of R v Revenue and Customs Commissioners, which was brought to the Supreme Court to determine the correct characterisation of a contract. In his article, entitled “Amendments in retrospect – Repair or replace? (R v Revenue and Customs Commissioners)”, Alexander explores the legal distinctions between amendment, rescission and replacement, the relevant contextual considerations for the courts and...
Continue reading
