Gemma White, 3PB sports barrister, summarises the recent case of Best - v- BHA on the appearance of bias and sufficiency of reasons

16th August 2016

Gemma White, 3PB sports barrister, summarises the recent case of Best - v- BHA on the appearance of bias and sufficiency of reasons.

Her article titled "The Best of intentions: what Best v. BHA has taught us about appearance of bias and sufficiency of reasons" can be read by clicking on this link:
https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/item/the-best-of-intentions-what-best-v-bha-has-taught-us-about-appearance-of-bias-sufficiency-of-reasons

Gemma White (Call 2009) has particular experience in disciplinary matters and has advised governing bodies, including a local FA, on diverse Equality Act matters, such as ethics, safeguarding and transgender policy.

Gemma has experience of anti-doping and has appeared before the UK national anti doping Tribunal. She has advised and represented an athlete in the first anti-doping case under the revised 2015 Code.

She is currently completing an LLM in Sports Law and Practice at De Montfort University and is a member of the British Association of Sport and the Law.