Sarah Clarke

Sarah Clarke

Call 2005

 Download CV
 Download vCard


Employment and Equalities

Sarah is an employment law specialist. She appears for both Claimants and Respondents at the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal. She has experience of the following types of claims:

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Constructive dismissal
  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Sex discrimination
  • Race discrimination
  • Disability discrimination including failure to make reasonable adjustments claims
  •  Sexual orientation discrimination
  • 'Whistleblowing'
  • Unlawful deduction from wages/ holiday pay claims
  • Illegal contracts of employment
  • TUPE
  • Equal pay

Recent cases of interest include:

  • In Fathers v Pets at Home Ltd UKEAT/0424/13/DM, an appeal under the Equality Act 2010, Sarah successfully argued that the tribunal had erred because they had not addressed the ‘deduced effects’ and ‘likelihood of recurrence’ provisions in determining whether or not the Claimant was disabled;
  • Securing an extremely favourable settlement for the claimant (on day 1 of a 4 day trial) in a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against a premier league football club;
  • Acting for the 2nd Respondent in the Remploy litigation (ongoing). Claims have been brought by over 1,000 employees arising out of the closure of several Remploy factories across the country as a result of a decision by the DWP to reduce funding;
  • Acting for the claimant in an 8 day trial involving allegations of race discrimination/victimisation against a London Borough Council;
  • Acting for the claimant in a 4 day trial against the Swedish Church in London in an unfair dismissal and age discrimination claim;
  • Acting for the respondent College of Further Education in a claim by a tutor for constructive unfair dismissal in a 4 day trial. The claim included allegations of bullying against the Principal;
  • Acting for the claimant in a claim against the governing body of a school in a 3 day trial in a claim for constructive unfair dismissal and ‘whistleblowing’;
  • Acting for the respondent (a well known London restaurant) in a claim for unfair dismissal arising from an alleged assault in the workplace;
  • Acting for the Science and Technologies Facilities Council in a claim for age discrimination in a 3 day claim
  • Acting for the claimant, an IT Technician, in a 3 day claim for unfair dismissal and direct/indirect sex discrimination, discrimination on the grounds of maternity leave and discrimination on the grounds of being a part-time worker, in relation to a redundancy procedure;
  • Acting for the respondent, an employment advice centre, in a 5 day unfair dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation claim (involving applications to the EAT);
  • Acting for the claimant, a midwife, in a 4 day trial in a claim for unfair dismissal arising out of allegations of gross negligence in respect of 2 births;
  • Acting for the respondent in a 4 day trial in a claim for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. The claimant, a registered nurse in a care home for the elderly, was dismissed on the basis of gross negligence and putting residents at risk;
  • Acting for claimant in a mediation. The claim was for unfair dismissal and maternity/sex discrimination.

Sarah also has experience of interim injunction applications in the High Court to enforce restrictive covenants. Her most recent case involved an insurance broker who had grounds to believe that an ex-employee had copied their client database.

Sarah regularly advises on all aspects of employment law. Sarah has recently advised on the following:

  • Whether or not a PGA training scheme constituted a modern apprenticeship;
  • Whether or not a collective agreement was enforceable such that the claimant was entitled to an enhanced redundancy package;
  • Whether or not a dismissal was fair in a case involving allegations that an employee had been looking up pornographic material at work. Further question as to whether employee was disabled within the meaning of the DDA and whether the dismissal was discriminatory;
  • Advising the respondent whether or not a TUPE transfer had taken place in a case involving the application of Regulation 8(7) of TUPE (insolvency);
    Sarah also accepts instructions to draft pleadings and has recently prepared the following pleadings;
  • Prepared response to a claim alleging constructive unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday and sick pay. The claim involved allegations that the claimant, a partner in a residential care home, was guilty of financial mismanagement, had failed to implement the policies and procedures which are required by the Local Authority in relation to safeguarding issues, loss of revenue and so on;
  • Drafting grounds of complaint in a case involving allegations of unfair dismissal and direct sex discrimination.

Sarah has been appointed to the barrister panel of ELAAS (the Employment Lawyers Appeals Advice Scheme). ELAAS is a service offering pro bono employment law advice to appellant and respondents where there is a preliminary hearing in the EAT with no previous legal representation on record. She therefore has conducted several rule 3(10) permission hearings. 

News

June 20 2017:

Sarah Clarke provides an employment case law update for the past month ...read more


May 31 2017:

3PB Employment and Equalities Group partners with ACAS to deliver Employment Tribunals masterclass ...read more


August 24 2015:

Team 3PB tough it out ...read more


... more news

Academic Qualifications

BA (Oxon)

BVC Nottingham Law School

Inner Temple Exhibition 2004

Sally Ball Award 2004

Professional Bodies

  • Employment Law Bar Association (ELBA)